{
How to Cite a Wikipedia Reference
|
How to Cite a Wikipedia Reference
}
When citing Wikipedia, it is important to cite the revision number and the date when the content was modified. This will ensure that the reference is authentic. There are a variety of sources that can replace a Wikipedia reference. In addition, citing Wikipedia is a good choice for new topics, since it is free and the content is not likely to change.
Sources to replace wikipedia references
Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. Because of this, many teachers warn against using it as a primary or secondary source. However, it is a useful tool for exploratory tertiary research, which can help you learn more about a topic. However, it should be used critically and with extreme caution.
While Wikipedia has a history function, it may not be obvious to many users. If you’re citing an article from Wikipedia, you must remember to include the date you accessed it, as this allows future researchers to reference the entry accurately. Furthermore, if you’re reviewing an article, you should pay special attention to the sources cited in the article. For example, if an article relies on a study, you should cite the original study that was the source of the information.
Impact of citing wikipedia on academic citations
There are several problems with citing Wikipedia, and one of them is that it is not always reliable. For one thing, the articles on Wikipedia are not necessarily original. You can check the reference citations for each article on Wikipedia to verify the reliability of the information. Also, the articles in Wikipedia are only intended as starting points for research. While this can be a good way to get an overview of a subject, it should be avoided as a sole source of research. Nevertheless, if you need supplementary impact evidence for your academic monograph, Wikipedia may be the answer. However, you should avoid using Wikipedia for stakeholder evaluations, since results can be easily manipulated.
Wikipedia has many advantages over traditional academic publishing. It is a dynamic site, and the content is constantly evolving. The codebase of Wikipedia is updated and maintained to ensure that the information is accurate. The editors of Wikipedia also ignore irrelevant articles. As a result, irrelevant articles have no effect on referencing decisions.
Effectiveness of citing wikipedia in indexed journals
The effectiveness of citing Wikipedia as a source is questioned by many academics. Many educators have barred their students from citing Wikipedia as a source in their academic writing because it is considered a non-reliable source. However, there are some ways to make it a useful source in your paper without having to compromise on quality.
One of the most obvious ways to use Wikipedia as a source is to include its articles in your reference list. But you must keep in mind that Wikipedia is a public website. It is susceptible to vandalism, and any entry could contain incorrect information. Also, citing Wikipedia can lead to plagiarism, so it is important to double check before citing it.
Impact of citing wikipedia in indexed health science journals
The impact of citing Wikipedia in indexed health science journals is unclear. A recent study aims to investigate the frequency of citations in the health literature by identifying journals and examining the citation style of Wikipedia. Researchers used the online databases Scopus and Web of Science to examine citations in health journals published since 2001.
The number of Wikipedia citations in indexed health science journals was quite small compared to other sources. However, it showed a slight tendency to cite high impact ISI journals. Journals such as Nature, Science, and the New England Journal of Medicine had the highest numbers of citations.