The story is the fact that founder of Lending Club, Renaud Leplanche, who had been ousted in a scandal in might had been developing a venture that is new contend with Lending Club called Credify. Headlines mentioned 2nd Act or Comeback.
The tale arrived on the scene within the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and were good journalism that is old-fashioned around for the information by considering business filings.
I really do maybe not think there was a lot of tale about Credify it self. The likelihood of success for that endeavor are slim ( more on that later). The story hangs on 3 threads:
So what does this inform us concerning the continuing state of online journalism?
Does this justify selling Lending Club stock?
exactly what does this whole tale reveal in regards to the change of customer financing
So what does this inform us in regards to the state of online journalism?
News drives markets and digitization is changing news, and this is indirectly a Fintech tale.
This aspect of the story interests me as a media entrepreneur.
It was either a non-story done under time stress which had a big impact or an conventional information from hard core investigative journalism. The latter is usually to be celebrated considering that the economics of electronic media don’t allow much plan for hard core investigative journalism. Visualize All Of The Presidents Men today.
Enough time force on reporters is intense, because the online ad model post search, social and adblockers, does not allow time for hard core investigative journalism today.
There’s no web web site for Credify (various spellings and .tld urls end in an alley that is blind and no body is chatting regarding the record. Let’s assume the whole story holds true. It really seems that a ongoing company called Credify was made by Renaud Leplanche. This event would have gone unnoticed just one out of 1,000,000 new businesses created each year in America alone without a famous name impacting a public stock.
And so I incline for this being a non-story done under time pressure. Needless to say, only time will inform and activities may show me personally incorrect. Credify may launch and quickly reach the $50m in revenues mentioned when you look at the WSJ article since the target for 2017.
A non-story done under time force unsettles markets because, if it comes down from a respected supply such as WSJ, other publications repeat the tale citing the initial post as evidence. That is what took place into the Credify story, that was shortly regarding the technology front page (Techmeme).
Does this justify selling Lending Club stock?
$LC stock did drop a bit the time after from the sixteenth and also by significantly more than 5% the next day in the 17th and a little more from the eighteenth. Over $125m of market value evaporated. Nobody understands for certain why a stock moves payday loans in Florida in this instance there were additionally choices expiring, the stock had increased sharply and could have required a modification, there clearly was a negative post on Zero Hedge (do they will have positive posts?) and an account about Lending Tree that defined them as rivals (improperly in my own view).
Disclosure; i got myself LC stock following the May crash (got in at 3.51). That is the reason I happened to be attention that is paying the Credify tale. My investing approach would be to do lots of fundamental analysis before buying therefore as it comes in and make a Buy/Sell/Hold decision that I have context to look at news. This tale was a Hold choice it had been “noise in the line”.