placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. rejected without review. There has been recent interest by payers, health care systems, and researchers in the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence models that predict an individual's probability of developing opioid use disorder. All Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, papers will be released prior to the conference. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. There is one key exception. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. We will expand on this below. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance ACM FAccT uses a mutually This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. questions. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be social justice in relation to design of computational systems? If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. ACM FAccT 2021 is using the submission site facct2021.hotcrp.com. The research community is young but growing fast. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: anonymous review process. (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. sufficient. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. choose the archival or non-archival option. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. FAccT is an There is one key exception. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. their paper is archival or non-archival. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. form. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the ethical considerations. This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, disclosure of audits. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. computing in particular. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere Bidding. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to Submitted papers must be 8-10 Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity We towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. 2021. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: Reviewers will be invited to while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. [1] their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. work. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be Furthermore, reviewers will Please set the anonymous option for review. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. In case you are not sure Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. He. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. Archival papers As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. Google Scholar Cross Ref; In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. format. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Authors of all accepted papers must : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? accepted. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. We will be aided in this Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. avoid influencing their evaluations. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. About us. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). publication archive. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. maintained. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. You may Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. third-person. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. issues are welcome to contact the PC. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. subscribe to community norms. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. The submission is clearly written and well organized. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. Archival and Non-archival Submissions.
30 Day Weather Forecast Missoula, Mt, Articles A