Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. This lens provides all of these requirements. p.s. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. In 3 months I got loosy focus ring. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. Agreed. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. I got many great shots from this lens but also missed ton of shots due manual focus only. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. Interesting. It starts out very sharp at f/2.0, gets even sharper at f/2.8, and softens only slightly at f/11. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". The lenses I listed are certainly not the ONLY exceptional lenses made over the years. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " This way you get both lenses with only one! (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. - in my subjects' skin. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. I can tell you its a great performer for astro use. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. At $900 US it a relative steal. At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. Do you expect me to gawk? Lots of wet blankets around here. CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. Backwards compatible (film). But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? At under 900USD, it's a steal. I read and bought it. Check out some of the photos he took. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. The 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.2 is another story.While the 135mm f/2, in general, is a good lens, there are lots of lenses other than the 135 f/2 that will produce a very smoothly blurred background, including zoom lenses.It sounds like Micael is new to photography.Just my impression from this article. (cont. BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. If you can afford it buy this lens, you will love it. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. But do some experimenting before you decide. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000! Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. This is the EF-M series version. You will see why. Standards have risen in recent years. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. One difference worth pointing out is for those who image using narrowband filters. IQ will rival any other lens. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. Everyone should have one? The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. Large focus ring. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. We think it rises to the challenge. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Several functions may not work. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. Another lens to consider at this focal length (at maximum zoom) is the Rokinon 135mm F/2. etc.. Ron. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. For example, a friend recently recommended Pentax 6x7 prime lenses which were designed for a large format flat field, and are also adaptable to the EOS system. I wish every lens was this good!! It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. It is by far the fastest focusing, best bokeh, and lowest light lens you will ever find. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Check them out for yourself! People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. Are you really using 135 a lot? At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Cost. Other times, like the Witch Head Nebula, I love seeing the star responsible for the object in all its glaring glory! [emailprotected]. The North America Nebula captured using the 135mm lens with a clip-in Ha filter. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/314771597/ Click on following link to view images The first shot I ever took with this lens was of my neighbor's cat, as it was sneaking around in a bush. $581.00 for 7 days. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, Bond, I expect you to buy! Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. Andysea, those are great images on your website. Build quality: excellent. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. I understand the optical design is quite old. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. Definitely now on my to-buy list. Orion nebula shot with Canon T3i and Rokinon 135mm @ F2.0 150 shots with dark bias and flats stacked and edited. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. 1. It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. Great for portraits. For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. Yes there's bokeh. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. Stuff I used to take the photos. Available 03/21/23. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. With weather sealing this would be a 10. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. I have an old 135/2.5 Takumar that is not bad at all, for the price. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. The extremes are 2 and 22. For this reason, a combination of a good light pollution filter, and the use of flat calibration frames are recommended. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. You don't have to worry about shopping for a better lens anymore. Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. http://www.idyll.com/laneysat The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Check out Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out.
Teri Bauer Death Scene, My Boyfriends Snapchat Score Keeps Going Up, The Johnson Family Murders, My Ex Saw Me And Waved, Articles C